The Bobtail Squid (Euprymna
scolopes) maintains a population of bioluminescent bacteria (Vibrio fischeri) within a bi-lobed (light)
organ, which is used to affect an anti-predatory behaviour called counter
illumination. V.fischeri are not
transferred from parent to larvae, as when they hatch the bobtail squid
harbours none of these symbionts, but uses the light organ to attract them from
its surroundings. The Bobtail squid goes through a cycle of expelling its
symbionts in the morning and re-establishing a well populated colony during the
day. The light organ is specifically attractive to V.fischeri. This paper reviews research into the symbiosis between
these two organisms.
There are three stages of symbiotic colonisation in the case
of the bobtail squid: Initiation, in which the symbionts enter the light organ
and begin to divide, accommodation, in which high cell density is achieved and
persistence, which is the continued re-growth of symbiont colonies after they
have been expelled.
All of the aspects of the colonisation process are strongly
linked to motility in the symbionts through flagella. This paper outlines the
effect that some genetic mutations in this trait, all of which reduce the
chances of the symbiont forming a symbiosis with the bobtail squid. Research
has also shown that genes associated with the expression of flagella in V.fischeri could also have some control
over other aspects of the bacteria, which could go some way to explaining why
symbiosis was not properly re-established when the mutation was genetically
complimented.
Luminescence is an important part of symbiotic persistence.
The paper also goes on to explain in a similar fashion that studies on
mutations in the genes controlling this function cause problems with initiation
as well as persistence. It is suggested again that problems with these genes
lead to problems with the overall biology of the symbionts and could explain
why symbiosis does not easily occur.
Studies have shown that morphological changes occur in the
squid’s light organ after initial colonisation by the symbionts. This most
importantly includes a narrowing of part of the entry duct called the antechamber,
into which bacteria enter the organ. It has been suggested that this helps to
maintain an optimal bacteria colony size, as it seems to act as a physical
barrier between the light organ and the surroundings. This aspect of the
symbiosis is curious, as this type of morphological change is usually
associated with harmful bacteria. It may be possible that the symbiotic
relationship was originally brought about by pathogenic bacteria. Research in
other animal groups have also found that bacteria considered to be “toxic” can
actually cause beneficial tissue development, suggesting that the action of the
bacteria is highly context dependent. The paper also goes on to suggest that
the chemical pathways taken by pathogenic and symbiotic bacteria are very
similar, though lead to very different ends.
The collation of this evidence seems to raise as many
questions as it answers with regard to the symbiosis between V.fischeri and E.scolopes. In particular, more investigation into the similarities
and differences between these symbionts and pathogens is required. Further study
will also need to include genetic diversification in the bacteria among many
other things, so that we can start to understand the crucial roles that
beneficial microbes play on animal health and development.
A review of Visick K.L. and Ruby E.G. (2006) Vibrio fischeri and its host: it takes two to tango, Current opinion in microbiology 9 632-638
A review of Visick K.L. and Ruby E.G. (2006) Vibrio fischeri and its host: it takes two to tango, Current opinion in microbiology 9 632-638
3 comments:
I found this review pretty hard going and there were a few things I'm not sure I entirely understood. Any thoughts or comments would be much appreciated. I also have a nagging feeling I've seen this paper on the blog somewhere even though I couldn't find it, so sorry if you've already done this one!
Happy new year everyone.
I can't see that anybody else has posted about this paper. I reviewed one which went into more detail about how mutations in the bacteria that stop specific genes from functioning properly will cause the squid to reject them. It somehow manages to only reject the bacteria with the mutation if both wild type and mutants are present. The squid is VERY good at choosing which bacteria it feels is satisfactory.
Happy New Year to you too.
It would seem that pathogenic bacteria only become a problem at certain densities in an oraganism. So this pathogenic bacteria is very useful to the squid only upto a certain density before they must be expelled. Ive been reading papers on probiotics for fish and the same is true there. Known pathogens given to fish at certain doses in their feed can actually improve disease resistance to other pathogens (Brunt and Austin, 2005 and Irianto and Austin, 2002). Its all about the balance.
Post a Comment