Aeromonas salmonicida is a species
of bacteria which causes furunculosis. It has been of major concern to salmon
farmers and it is thought that the disease may also be contributing to the
decline in salmon populations as wild salmon is becoming infected by farmed
fish in sea cages. In recent years farmers have been getting the disease under
control partially due to the introduction of vaccines.
This study has investigated the best
way of testing for potency of furunculosis vaccines in Salmo salar L (Atlantic salmon). The immune status of test fish was
tested before the experiment had begun and many pre-existing antibodies were
documented. The fish were divided into three groups, each kept at a different
temperature (3, 12 and 18oC). Two experimental vaccine formulations
were produced for the study and two control groups were included. One of the
vaccines contained the same quality and quantity of A. salmonicida, Moritella
viscosa and Infectious Pancreatic
Necrosis Virus (IPNV) antigen as a commercially available formation, the
full dose (FD) formulation. The other vaccine contained only 5% of the full
dose for bacterial antigens and 10% of the IPNV, the reduced dose (RD)
formulation. The two controls were injected with either just an adjuvant (AD)
or physiological saline (PS). The antibody response of a random selection of
fish was then tested at 3, 6, 9 and 12 weeks.
It was found that the level of
protection did not significantly increase between 6 and 12 weeks after
vaccination in fish which had been kept at 12 and 18oC which shows
that the fish have already developed protective immunity against A. salmonicida. Fish that were kept at
18oC had peak antibody resistance at 3 weeks after vacciniation,
which is much earlier than those kept at 12oC (9 weeks), but the
optimum temperature for Salmonid fish is 8-14oC so other problems
would likely occur if the fish were farmed at such a high temperature. The
findings have also suggested that the best time to test the antibody levels in S.salar is between 500 and 700o
days (immunisation temperature (oC) multiplied by the number of
immunisation days at that temperature).
At 6 and 12 weeks after vaccination
some fish kept at 3 and 18oC, of each vaccine group, were
acclimatised to 12oC for two days. After this period the fish were
then kept with the same number of fish, taken from a 12oC tank, and
all kept together in a tank kept at 12oC. A proportion of these fish
were then injected with A. salmonicida.
It was found that most of the fish were protected, however fish previously from
a 3oC tank that were put in the new tank after just 6 weeks were
found to have low protection and antibody levels regardless of which vaccine
group they were in. If the fish were reared for 12 weeks in the 3oC
tank and then transferred however, the FD vaccine group did have a protective
effect. Fish from the control groups all had low survival rates as is expected.
This study has shown that the
vaccine is not very effective in fish kept at 3oC and that it is
best to test for antibody levels in fish that have been kept at 12oC
between 6-9 weeks after vaccination, as after this there is a sharp decrease in
antibody levels.
Reference:
Romstad, A. B. et al. (2011). Development of an antibody ELISA for potency
testing of furunculosis (Aeromonas salmonicida subsp salmonicida) vaccines in
Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar L). Biologicals, 40(1), 67-71.
2 comments:
Hey Matt,interesting post!
Maybe i'm missing something really obvious - (think all this sun is making my brain go fuzzy!!) but i was just wondering why fish kept at higher temperatures produced antibody resistance quicker than those kept at lower temperatures?
The paper doesn't mentioned why this happens but I'm assuming it's because the immune system of the fish has an optimum temperature at which it works best, if the temperature of the water was raised higher than 18oC then the fish would likely start developing antibody resistance more slowly after the optimum temperature.
Post a Comment