Microbial dimethyl sulfide (DMS)
production is very important in the global sulfur cycle, being the
major route of sulfur transfer from oceans to atmosphere and then
back to the land.
Microbes convert
dimethylsulfoniopropionate (DMSP), mainly produced by marine
phytoplankton, to DMS by at least three different enzymes that cleave
DMSP. One of these, DddL, is a DMSP lyase, whose products are
acrylate and DMS, and has thus far only been found in marine
α-proteobacteria. Another enzyme, DddP, occurs in α-proteobacteria
and in some fungi, but its mechanism of action is unknown.
The third
system involves an acyl CoA transferases encoded by dddD, a gene that
occurs in marine γ-proteobacteria and in other bacterial taxa who
acquired it by horizontal gene transfer.
DMSP-catabolizing bacteria
have been already isolated from several DMSP-rich environments,
including corals, algal blooms, copepods and salt marshes. But this
was the first time that such bacteria have been isolated from the gut
microflora of a fish, the Atlantic Herring (Clupea harengus)
in this case, which feeds on copepods, which in turn consume
DMSP-containing phytoplankton.
In this study, after a series of
enrichments in DMSP-containing liquid medium, the gut samples were
cultured by the authors, on minimal agar plates with DMSP as the sole carbon source. Two different colony types were identified and assayed for DMS
production by gas chromatography. The 16S rRNA genes were cloned and
then sequenced and the closest (99% identical) relatives were found
to be Pseudomonas guineae LMG 24017 and Psychrobacter
arenosus R7T. These newly isolated strains were termed J465 and
J466, respectively and both produced large amounts of DMS, whose
levels were significantly enhanced when cells were pre-grown on 5-mM
DMSP. The two strains were also examined for growth on acrylate and
3-hydroxypropionate (one of the earliest catabolites formed after the
action of DddD on DMSP), as some other DMSP-catabolizing species can
use these compounds. Pseudomonas J465 did not grow on either
compound, but Psychrobacter J466 grew on 3-hydroxy-propionate
as the sole carbon source. Moreover, acrylate and 3-hydroxy-propionate
were found to induce DMS production in Psychrobacter J466, but not in
Pseudomonas J465.
To identify the relevant genes in these
new isolates, genomic libraries of the two strains were constructed
by the authors, mobilizing a wide host-range cosmid into Escherichia
coli and screening it for any gene that conferred DMS production
to the host. One such cosmid was identified from each library and
their inserts were sequenced. Both contained homologues of dddD,
which is responsible for the initial step in DMSP catabolism. In
addition, several neighboring genes resembled those that occur near
dddD in Marinomonas MWYL1, such as dddT (involved in DMSP
transport), dddR (DMSP regulation) or dddB and dddC, which are
involved in the later stages of DMSP catabolism and which
respectively encode polypeptides related to alcohol dehydrogenases
and aldehyde dehydrogenases.
In another study on the Atlantic
Menhaden (a close relative of the Herring), approximately 65% of the
DMSP was shown to be incorporated into the animals’ flesh or
excreted unmodified, with very little DMS being actually released
when fish were fed DMSP-containing algae. The fate of the remaining
35% of DMSP is unknown, but it can be demethylated, through the
action of dmdA (a widespread gene in marine bacteria) in a process
that liberates no DMS. Or otherwise the DMS eventually formed by Dddþ bacteria
could be catabolized by other DMS-using bacteria.
Dddþ microbes may occur in other
marine carnivores such as seabirds, cetaceans, penguins and seals
which often use DMS as a chemoattractant to find their prey. So it
might even be in the fish’s interest not to emit it, especially
since herrings may communicate at night by forming bubbles from their
posteriors.
Further work is thus needed to determine the full range
of bacterial types, and the relative contributions of different
pathways involved in DMSP catabolism in marine predators and it would
be interesting to establish the contributions of such animal's
microflora to the global turnover of DMSP.
Reference:
Curson, A.R.J., Sullivan,
M.J., Todd, J.D. & Johnston, A.W.B. (2010). Identification of
genes for dimethyl sulfide production in bacteria in the gut of
Atlantic herring (Clupea harengus). ISME J 4:144–146.
2 comments:
Hi, this seems a really intresting paper, I am wondering if I have got the wrong end of the stick but this could be very important climate wise. Obviously DMS is important for forming cloud condensation nuclei. It seems that the idea of using iron to fetilise oceans to promote the production of DMS would need to consider the effect of the predetors of the phytoplankton/ copepods in the picture.
Yes, you're right. That was one of the basic tenet of Lovelock's Gaia hypotesis for cooling down the planet. But since then, i think that iron fertilization has shown to be more dangerous than effective. One of the reasons is the one stated in this article, but you should also consider the potential increase in HAB's, the potential increase in benthic anoxic processes (increase in the sinking rate of microalgae) and various other negative aspects related to the disturbance of an existing food chain (such as explosions of jellyfish). In my opinion changing an ecosystem into another is never a real good solution. However, the fertilization idea is still really stimulating but unfortunately the side effects are not yet well understood.
Post a Comment