Silver nanoparticles
(AgNPs) are one of the most widely used nanomaterials in products across
industries. They are often used for their antimicrobial activity in medicine
and are also often found in detergents. Unfortunately these nanoparticles are
highly mobile and easily transported into aquatic systems and although AgNPs
are beneficial to us, in the products previously discussed, they have been
shown to have a negative impact on marine ecosystems, the extent of which is
not yet known. As the nanoparticles have such a large surface area to volume ratio
it is thought that AgNP react strongly with compartments within and outside of
the cell which may cause problems such as an increase in free radical
production, causing oxidative stress, which may fatally damage the cells
This paper investigates the detrimental
effects of AgNPs on two species of microalgae; Chlorella vulgaris, a freshwater species, and Dunaliella tertiolecta, a marine species. The two species of algae
were exposed to varying concentrations of AgNPs (0 mg/l, 0.01 mg/l, 0.1 mg/l, 1
mg/l and 10 mg/l) for 24 hours. They investigated the damage done to the
different algae and different exposures using a number of methods. Any morphological
changes between the different exposures were recorded. As well as this the total
chlorophyll, amount of viable cells, amount of reactive oxygen species (ROS)
formation and amount of lipid peroxidation were measured.
It was found that both algal species
showed cell aggregate formation (at 0.1 mg/l AgNPs) compared to the control (o
mg/l) and it was also found that at 10 mg/l AgNPs C. vulgaris formed large aggregates. It was also found that the
total chlorophyll count decreased with increasing concentrations of AgNPs in
both species of algae. The total chlorophyll in D. tertiolecta was 75% (of the total chlorophyll in the control) at
10 mg/l in comparison to 50% in C.
vulgaris. The number of viable cells also decreased with increasing AgNP
concentration and there was a drastic decrease in viable cells at 10 mg/l with
4% (of the viable cells in the control) in D.
tertiolecta and a 12% in C. vulgaris.
The amount of lipid peroxidation and ROS levels (both per viable cells) increased
with increasing concentration. It was also found that the amount of lipid
peroxidation and ROS levels in D. tertiolecta
were much higher than those in C.
vulgaris.
The results of this paper clearly
indicate that both of the species of algae are badly affected by the presence
of AgNPs at concentrations as low as 0.01 mg/l and that at 10 mg/l the
production of ROS increases dramatically. D. tertiolecta,
the marine species, is more severely affected by AgNPs, It is however thought
that this may be because more chloride is present in the seawater growth medium,
in comparison to the freshwater growth medium, and that this chloride augments
the toxic effects of silver. As algae play a vital role in oxygen production
and are involved in the food chain the presence of AgNPs may have a huge effect
on the wider aquatic community and it is therefore clear that something needs
to be done to reduce the amount of AgNPs being leaked into the environment.
Reference: Oukarroum,
A., Bras, S., Perreault, F., & Popovic, R. (2012). Inhibitory effects of
silver nanoparticles in two green algae, Chlorella
vulgaris and Dunaliella tertiolecta.
Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety, 78, 80-85.
8 comments:
I was struggling with my wording when explaining the chlorophyll and viable cell results. I think I got there in the end but that may just be because I've read the paper and know them anyway but if they still don't seem to make sense just say and I'll *try* to explain them better.
No I think it made sense, it was an intresting review. Good luck on exams
Thanks. You too
It read well to me, I'm concerned about the impacts silver nano particles may have on bacteria, for some sp. they are bactericidal agents, this may have implications for biogeochemicalcycling, they use silver nanoparticles as an antibiotic on burn victims, they undoubtedly end up in our water works etc.
Corin, I think they already did. NPs seem to be everywhere now and yeah they have quite big impact on bacterial colonization and biofilm formations. I reckon in a decade or so is going to be this same story as with everything else. Is too much money involved around NPs and it will take some time to get rid of it. Until perhaps people will start dying of cancer. Dark scenario I know but very realistic I think.
Ye. Unfortuantely the nanoparticles are small enough to fit through any filters used in water purification, as far as I know, and obviously chemicals used to kill bacteria in water works wouldn't have an effect on AgNPs. In fact AgNPs are often actively being used in the water purification process.
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0927776509005384
Post a Comment