Monday 26 March 2012

Tetrodotoxin: a potential pain killer?


Tetrodotoxin (TTX) is a neurotoxin with no confirmed antidote. It is most commonly known to occur in puffer fish (the Tetraodontidae family) although it has been confirmed that it is not the puffer fish themselves that produce the toxin but rather a micro-organism that migrates and then grows inside of them after birth. The toxin causes paralysis in humans and other vertebrates by blocking voltage-gated sodium channels (VGSCs), which often leads to death.  Due to its ability to block VGSCs there has also been research into the possibility that TTX may be used as a pain killer.

VGSCs are large essential membrane proteins which initiate and propagate action potentials and are composed of an α-subunit as well as one or more supporting β-subunits. The α-subunit is the part of the protein which determines the biophysical properties of the channel, including ion selectivity, whereas the β-subunits can modify the kinetic and voltage dependence properties of the channel and are also involved in the interaction of the protein with cell adhesion molecules, extracellular matrix and intracellular cytoskeleton. There are nine known mammalian α-subunit isoforms, all with differing tissue localisations and sensitivity to TTX but similar structural properties. They are made up of four homologous domains, each of which contain six transmembrane α-helical segments, connected by both extracellular an intracellular loops (Figure one of the referenced paper depicts this (page 283)). Within the α-subunit there are also binding sites for neurotoxins that can alter channel function.

TTX binds to a receptor site on the α-subunit and blocks the influx of sodium ions by obstructing the outer pore of the channel, which in turn inhibits the propagation of action potentials causing paralysis. The effects of TTX vary depending on the α-subunit isoform; some isoforms need higher concentrations of TTX than others to become blocked. Some of the isoforms which are more greatly affected by TTX have been shown to also play a big part in the expression of pain and so low levels of TTX could potentially be used to selectively block these channels to alleviate pain.

The effects of TTX on acute pain have not been well documented although data has suggested that it may have a little impact on acute pain. The toxins effects on inflammatory and neuropathic pain however have been better documented. The toxins effects on neuropathic pain have been widely studied as evidence has suggested that TTX-sensitive VGSCs have a key role in neuropathic pain and the majority of these studies have suggested that TTX may be an inhibitor of neuropathic pain. There have been fewer studies on the effects of the toxin on inflammatory pain but the few studies that have been done have shown that TTX may also inhibit inflammatory pain.

Unfortunately the few case studies that have been done have not been particularly promising. The one with the most positive results showed that the chronic pain of cancer patients was alleviated in half of the participants but it is unknown why only 50% responded to the treatment. It is clear from current research that TTX is likely to have pain relieving however further research would be needed if the toxin were ever to be used medically.

Reference: Nieto, F. R., & et al. (2012). Tetrodotoxin (TTX) as a Therapeutic Agent for Pain. Marine Drugs, 10, 281-305.

9 comments:

Corin Liddle said...

Hi Matt, I'm interested in the toxin production, does it say how it acquires these toxin producing microbes? or What type or species of microbes they are? thanks Corin

Matt Morgan said...

Hi Corin, I was under the impression that the species of bacteria which produced the toxin was not known but I just found this article (http://repositorio-aberto.up.pt/bitstream/10216/56918/2/Tese%20Marcos%20Final.pdf) which states that there are a wide range of species of bacteria that have been found to produce the toxin.

The acquistion of the bacteria has not been extensively studied as there is still a debate about whether TTX does come from a symbiotic bacteria or accumulates in the diet, although most evidence seems to point toward the symbiotic bacteria. The acquistion probably varies quite a lot between the species that host the TTX producing bacteria, as there is such a wide variety of them.

Jennifer Mace said...

Hi Matt
This is a really interesting blog. It's amazing to think that one of the most dangerous chemicals produced by microorganisms could actually be used for good. The ides that TTX could be used as a painkiller doesn't seem to be that new though. Have a look at this for further reading -

Cheng-Zhong Wang, Hua Zhang, Hui Jiang, Wuyuan Lu, Zhi-Qi Zhao, Cheng-Wu Chi, A novel conotoxin from Conus striatus, μ-SIIIA, selectively blocking rat tetrodotoxin-resistant sodium channels, Toxicon, Volume 47, Issue 1, January 2006, Pages 122-132, ISSN 0041-0101, 10.1016/j.toxicon.2005.10.008.

- it's great that there is continuing research on TTX, as I would imagine that its effects as a painkiller could be estremely potent!

Matt Morgan said...

Interesting article. It's on a type of conotoxin rather than TTX but it's interesting to see where the idea for testing the pain killing effects of TTX may have come from as the two toxins work in a similar ways. As conotoxin binds to TTX resistant voltage-gated sodium channels it could potentially be used as a pain killer when TTX has no effect due to the TTX-R VGSCs.

Arainna said...

Hey guys, I found out some information a while ago about TTX, I thought you might find it interesting. As you might know TTX has been found in many different organisms such as the blue ringed octopus, crabs, starfish and even species of frog as was as in the pufferfish. A couple of papers highlight vibrio fischeri as responsible for TTX production in the xanthid crab and Vibrio alginolyticus to be responsible for TTX production in the puffer fish Fugu vernicularis and the starfish Astropecten polyacanthus. However another theory was put forward by Noguchi et al who didn’t believe that a sufficient amount of TTX could be produced by bacteria present in the fish and he suggested that it was accumulated throughout the food chain as the toxin is present in a wide number of species (marine and terrestrial) and that it would be highly unlikely that evolution would have led to the diverse number of species producing the same toxin. Studies have also shown the capability to produce fugu without toxin in captivity by controlling what the fish were able to eat. I’ve attached the names of a couple of papers if you want to have a look.
Noguchi T, Arakawa O. Tetrodotoxin- Distribution and accumulation in aquatic organisms, and cases of human intoxication, Marine Drugs. 2008; 6: 220-242.
Noguchi T, Arakawa O, and Takatani T. Toxicity of Pufferfish Takifugu rubripes cultured in netcages at sea or aquaria on land. Comparative biochemistry and physiology part D: genomics and proteomics. 2006; 1: 153-157.

I haven't heard anything about the use of TTX as a painkiller before but I guess it makes sense due to how it works. It's quite interesting really but I can't help thinking it could be quite dangerous!

Matt Morgan said...

Ye. I agree. It does sound very dangerous, just a small mistake in the dosage and it could kill somebody rather than helping with their pain. Very scary.

Ye. I read in a previous study on newts that produced the toxin that the diet could be a possible source of the toxin. It seems to be an on-going debate. The source of the toxin in animals may even vary between species.

Here's a few papers which talk about it further, with differing opinions.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010100001719

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010104002296

http://www.springerlink.com/content/p445m58x53816200/

Jennifer Mace said...

Sorry Matt, my mistake. I found that article really interesting so I thought it would make great further reading. I should have mentioned that it was about a possible alternative rather than just TTX.

I think it's amazing that we have produced fugu that do not produce the toxin, though I've heard that people don't want to eat the non-toxic version as it's lost all it's 'fun'!
Matt that last link you posted (http://www.springerlink.com/content/p445m58x53816200/) really brings home how dangerous TTX can be if we get things wrong. I truly hope that we research the idea of TTX being a painkiller properly before we start clinical trials.

Arainna said...

Thanks for the papers, they were a good read. It seems quite strange that even though this toxin is so widespread people don't really know where its origins are. I wonder whether there is an evolutionary factor involved such as a gene which is switched on for its production or a bacteria which has been engulfed into the organisms physiology, similarly to how the mitochondria was integrated into our own physiology.Its also interesting how we have been unable to find an antidote, however the garter snake seems to be the only animal found which is resistant to the toxin.

Matt Morgan said...

I really like that idea! That the bacteria that produce this toxin are currently going through the process of becoming an organelle.

It is odd how there's no remedy, especially as there has been studies which seem to have shown that certain treatments may suppress TTX but nothing seems to have come from it. This study is one of those but it is very recent so they may currently be working their way towards clinical trials.

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041010111003618